- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the proposed Major Road Network designation would comprise just 4% of England's roads but carry 43% of its traffic?
- Reviewed: to follow
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 18:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- This hook sounds good, but I think we should clarify that this network is not made entirely of new roads. How about this? epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the proposed Major Road Network designation would comprise just 4% of England's roads but carry 43% of its traffic?
- Hi epicgenius, thanks for your review. I am happy with the amended hook. I have now carried out a QPQ review at Template:Did you know nominations/Fagersta airspace surveillance tower - Dumelow (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response. This is now good to go. epicgenius (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)