Template:Did you know nominations/Gregor Virant List
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Gregor Virant's Civic List, Positive Slovenia
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that Gregor Virant's Civic List and Positive Slovenia, two newly-formed Slovenian political parties, already rank among top three for the upcoming parliamentary election, according to opinion polls?
Created/expanded by Tone (talk). Self nom at 19:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
 OCNative (talk)
|
 OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
OCNative (talk)
|
Slovene language sources are accepted in good faith.
- I made these minor spelling and grammar fixes to Gregor Virant's Civic List and these similar changes to Positive Slovenia.
- I also made 1 minor spelling fix and 1 grammar edit to the hook.
- Since someone moved Gregor Virant List to Gregor Virant's Civic List, so I accordingly modified this nomination (the heading, the article link in the hook, and the DYKmake credit) to reflect that (I did not move the nomination subpage due to the admonition that it could break lots of stuff).
- With all that noted, this is good to go for DYK. OCNative (talk) 05:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)