Template:Did you know nominations/Clay Higgins

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Clay Higgins

edit

Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 23:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC).

  • A QPQ review appears to be needed before this can move forward. North America1000 01:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  • QPQ is done. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Review

  • Article converted from redirect and nominated the same day, over 2000 characters so long enough, and policy compliant.
  • References need cleaning up, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 are newspaper articles missing publication dates, and 4 is a bare url.
  • QPQ review done, as required.
  • Washington Post source [2] confirms "Cajun John Wayne", so ALT0 is ok. He is no longer a Representative-elect, so a reference to his being an incumbent member of the House of Reps should be added and ALTs modified accordingly.
  • ALT0 is neutral and short enough.
  • Earwig raises no issues, merely noting names of positions etc, and no close paraphrasing is observed.
  • Text notes a deceased first wife who is not included in the infobox, she should be added if her name is available.
  • Referencing needs fixing and the House position needs updating, but these are easy fixes. ALT0 is fine, other ALTs dependent on updates. EdChem (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Hooks have been updated to indicate he's sworn in. Will look into the referencing later today. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • @EdChem: The bare url is filled in, and a source added that he was sworn in yesterday. Sources don't need to be fully filled out by any DYK rules that I'm aware of, though I will go through them anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • @Muboshgu: You are correct that the rules do not require the dates, but I do appreciate that you have provided them. Had you only addressed the bare url and added the update on swearing-in, I would probably have added the dates myself.  :) The ALTs are now all confirmed, so I can finalise the nomination. EdChem (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • ALT0, ALT1, and ALT2 are all confirmed. Nomination requirements met, ready for promotion. My preference is ALT1, but I'm comfortable with the others if the promoter has a different view. Nominator Muboshgu might want to express a preference, too. EdChem (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I also prefer ALT1. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)