Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Scrabis (basketball)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bob Scrabis (basketball)
- ... that Bob Scrabis was Princeton's high scorer in the 1989 Georgetown–Princeton basketball game? Source: https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/boxscores/1989-03-17-georgetown.html
- ALT1: ... that a rebound by Bob Scrabis got Princeton's final possession in the 1989 Georgetown–Princeton game? Source: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.chipublib.idm.oclc.org/apps/news/document-view?p=NewsBank&t=decade%3A1980%211980%2B-%2B1989&sort=YMD_date%3AA&page=9&fld-base-0=alltext&maxresults=20&val-base-0=Bob%20Scrabis&docref=news/0EB95F1B01E14B5E
- ALT2: ... that the 1989 Georgetown–Princeton basketball game, made Bob Scrabis "the face of Cinderella"? Source: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2625258-the-incredible-upset-that-has-never-happened
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Muchlis Ibrahim (2nd QPQ)
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 19:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bob Scrabis (basketball); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
AGF on the rebound hook. The article is new and long enough. The QPQ is done. The article has the correct inline citations and it appears to be free of copyright violations. (the detector is down). Well written and sourced article. Bruxton (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- User:Bruxton, I have found a better hook that is more verifyable and more likely to generate clickthroughs. Can you please approve ALT 2.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess that works because Time magazine called Princeton cinderella. i will leave it up to the promotor. Just an additional note: in the future do not red x the nomination. I removed it. Bruxton (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- User:Bruxton It is better explained in the WP:IC in his article. It is more because Princeton saved the cinderella seeds from being eliminated from future tournaments. The reason I think it is better because the WP:RS is online.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess that works because Time magazine called Princeton cinderella. i will leave it up to the promotor. Just an additional note: in the future do not red x the nomination. I removed it. Bruxton (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)