Template:Did you know nominations/Barrau de Sescas

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Barrau de Sescas

(

)

... that Barrau de Sescas, a Gascon knight, was the first person appointed by an English king to a position titled admiral? Source: "The first admiral appointed by an English k[ing] under that title was Barrau de Sescas, who on 1 Match 1295 received a commission as admiral of the fleet of Bayonne" from: Pryde, E. B.; Greenway, D. E.; Porter, S.; Roy, I. (23 February 1996). Handbook of British Chronology. Cambridge University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-521-56350-5.
- ALT1: ... that one historian credits the appointment of Barrau de Sescas as an admiral as one of the wisest actions of Edward I of England and John II, Duke of Brittany? Source: "the appointment of Bayonne's captain and admiral Barrau de Sescas, knight to marshal the combined maritime resources of England and Aquitaine in 1295 and 1297 was one of Edward I and Jean of Brittany's wisest acts? from: Vale, Malcolm Graham Allan (1996). The Origins of the Hundred Years War: The Angevin Legacy, 1250-1340. Clarendon Press. p. 204. ISBN 978-0-19-820620-0.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Sullivan (journalist)
- Comment: Note there had been other people appointed to similar positions but that this was the first explicitly called "admiral", earlier appointments will have been under different names, potentially the Latin "admiralis"

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 11:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Everything looks good to me... thanks for the interesting article! Slight preference for ALT0, but I'll leave the final pick to the promoter. DanCherek (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)