- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Annunciation Seminary (Pengzhou)
Annunciation Seminary, restored after its collapse in 2008 Sichuan earthquake; credit: Pandasea by
CC BY-SA 4.0
- ... that this abandoned seminary in Pengzhou, Sichuan, collapsed during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake upon its 100th year of completion? Source: "Les travaux débutent en 1895 pour ne s'achever qu'en 1908","... sa destruction lors d'un puissant tremblement de terre, le 12 mai 2008" [1]
- ALT1: ... that this abandoned seminary in Pengzhou, Sichuan, collapsed during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake upon its 100th year of completion, and was not rebuilt until 2016? Source: "Les travaux débutent en 1895 pour ne s'achever qu'en 1908","... sa destruction lors d'un puissant tremblement de terre, le 12 mai 2008", "... l'inauguration est prévue pour fin 2016" [2]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: My third DYK submission.
Created by TheLonelyPather (talk). Self-nominated at 03:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Annunciation Seminary (Pengzhou); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
@TheLonelyPather: Hello and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your created article is informative and well-referenced. The DYK is interesting and I prefer the initial version of the hook (not ALT1). The article was created today (12 March 2023) and has nearly 9,000 characters of prose, so the article is new enough and has over 1,500 characters as required by the DYK procedure. The hook is correct and is described in the article with proper references. The provided quotes in this DYK nomination from a supporting source are actually presented in it and I checked the French text using translator for verification of the content. The image is freely licensed. Assuming good faith, the QPQ is not yet required as this is TheLonelyPather's third DYK submission after this and this (confirmation: user page). -- Pofka (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
@TheLonelyPather: Hello and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your created article is informative and well-referenced. The DYK is interesting and I prefer the initial version of the hook (not ALT1). The article was created today (12 March 2023) and has nearly 9,000 characters of prose, so the article is new enough and has over 1,500 characters as required by the DYK procedure. The hook is correct and is described in the article with proper references. The provided quotes in this DYK nomination from a supporting source are actually presented in it and I checked the French text using translator for verification of the content. The image is freely licensed. Assuming good faith, the QPQ is not yet required as this is TheLonelyPather's third DYK submission after this and this (confirmation: user page). -- Pofka (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)