Overall: The hooks provided are interesting and the article is eligible based on newness and length, but there is a sentence that does not have a citation and the first two paragraphs contain copy-pasted text from one of the sources. Provide a citation for the unsourced sentence and rewrite the lead in your own words, then I'll give this another look. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Grnrchst (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
@Grnrchst: The Medical Liability Law sentence is sourced, through reference nine here. I've gone ahead and added the reference to that sentence too, I just followed the rational of not doing so previously per WP:CONSECUTIVECITE. I also rewrote the lead (I thought the previous phrasing was more detailed personally). For the second paragraph I don't see a way around changing that without changing the meaning, I didn't copypaste it, just what The Ministry of Health and Prevention defined as members of the committee here. Also, please ping me next time, didn't see this one until now. Thanks! jolielover♥talk 18:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
@Jolielover: That isn't what consecutivecite is saying though; you're supposed to put citations "at the end of the text that they support", not half way through, which leaves the rest of the text uncited. In any case, thanks for adding it back in. The text in the lead is still far too close for comfort to the original source;[1] either rewrite it properly or provide in-text attribution that makes it clear you are quoting from a source, rather than just leaving unattributed copied text. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@Grnrchst: I made some changes, please check now, thanks! 11:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for taking another look, I think this is good enough to approve now. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
