Template:Did you know nominations/20th century in ichnology

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

20th century in ichnology

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that during the 20th century, the first large scale excavation of dinosaur footprints was undertaken in Texas for an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History (pictured)?

Created by Abyssal (talk). Self-nominated at 15:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC).

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Arang

• Article new enough, long enough, and adequately cited. Hook short enough, interesting enough, and also cited. Article appears to be neutral and free of copyright violations and plagiarism. Cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• Hey, could we wait a little while to run this? I have a 19th century article that just needs a bit of sprucing before nominating and I'd like to run them in order. Abyssal (talk) 21:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

• The 19th century article is basically ready to nominate, I just need to finish its QPQ. Thanks for your patience. Abyssal (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

• @Abyssal: it's almost 2 weeks since your last note. Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Thr QPQ is finished, but no one's reviewed the article. It should go quickly when the review begins, that's all we're waiting for. Abyssal (talk) 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• @Abyssal: the article you mentioned was reviewed on July 1. Yoninah (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Great. Can we run these consecutively? Abyssal (talk) 13:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not in the same set, if that's what you're asking. In consecutive 12-hour sets, yes, or on consecutive days. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• That's what I meant. :D Can we run these two consecutive days in a similar time slot? Abyssal (talk) 17:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• It's up to the promoter, but I don't see why not. Note to promoter: the request is to run the 19th century article on one day, and this one 24 hours later. Since new sets hit the main page two times every day, this would mean promoting this article to the prep set two later than the prep set the 19th century article gets placed in. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)