Talk:Zhao Wei

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Vixtani in topic Introduction is too long
Former good articleZhao Wei was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 14, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 15, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 12, 2019, and March 12, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

An old article I found online for references

edit

http://english.people.com.cn/200401/07/eng20040107_132022.shtml Title: Zhao Wei on Rich & Famous http://www.danwei.org/magazines/zhao_wei_on_rich_famous.php

Zhao Wei on Cosmo http://www.danwei.org/magazines/zhao_wei_on_cosmo.php

Another from Times Asisa Review of Jade Goddess http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501040510-632140,00.html

Another from Times Asia on "so Close" http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501020916-349194,00.html

From Times Asia Princess Zhao http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,176181,00.html

Anotehr from Times Asia That's Zhao, as In 'Oh, Wow!' http://www.zhaoweinetfamily.com/news_e/news_e511.html http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,212725,00.html

Zhao Wei Dresses Casually for Postgraduate Study http://russian.china.org.cn/english/features/film/181444.htm


Zhao Wei and Lu Yi: Hottest Stars for Valentine's Day http://www.newsgd.com/enjoylife/entertainment/movietv/200411240012.htm

Mainland Pop Stars Dub for Shrek 2 http://english.cri.cn/1174/2004-8-5/64@138871.htm

Chinese Beauty Standard Released http://english.cri.cn/974/2005/10/14/63@24700.htm

Shang Guan Yan and Me http://english.cri.cn/349/2005/07/31/263@4870.htm "Little Swallow" Warbles After 4 Years of Silence http://english.cri.cn/2007/2004-11-14/67@167834.htm Asia Stars Shine at MTV Asia Awards http://english.cri.cn/349/2006/05/07/51@85481_1.htm "Double" Vicky Revealed to the Public http://english.cri.cn/2246/2005-7-20/67@259321.htm


Sky-high for Vicky Zhao's Moment In Peking http://english.cri.cn/2246/2005-6-3/67@243458.htm "Little Swallow" Breaks Promise: will Star in New TV Play http://english.cri.cn/2007/2004-9-17/90@152342.htm "Moment in Peking" Leads TV Drama Rankings http://english.cri.cn/349/2006/04/28/44@82867.htm

Rumour project "Tekken" Jet Li, Vicky Zhao to Star in Online Game Adaption http://english.cri.cn/349/2005/11/09/44@29699.htm

Vicky Zhao Leads the Long March for Education in Beijing http://english.cri.cn/2007/2004-10-14/67@159232.htm

Japanese Flag scandal

edit

It's very easy to find sources for this. Time Magazine [1], imdb [2], etc. etc. Removing a sourced section is vandalism. OhNoitsJamieTalk 07:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Hong Kong film award is the Chinese equivalent to an Academy Award, Bafta, Cesar, Goya or David Di Donatello...which she HAS NOT won.

Re-organize Article

edit

I was wondering if any of you would agree with me that this article could be re-organized. First of all, there's the problem with the lack of citations. You could probably find many sources from articles on Zhao Wei on zhaoweinetfamily.com

Secondly, I agree it looks pretty unbalanced, with the long list of awards. I think there should be more information about her early life and rise to prominence, as well as more details about her career, rather than a long list of awards and filmography (the filmography is necessary though, I suppose). Lulu288 00:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree! such as magazine poll result not worth to write here. And Best music video, best lyric..those are NOT for herself. Those award should goes with it's maker(creator). Meaningless award such as magazine poll should be removed. None of other actresses and actors wrote them as their lists. User:Sasalala 07:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


Awards List

edit
  • 2004 FHM Thailand Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 3
  • 2003 FHM Malaysia Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 50
  • 2004 US magazine Sirence of Cinema:International Actress of the Year
  • 2004 Singapore magazine Friday Weekly Students' Idol Poll:"Most Popular Chinese Actress"
  • 2004 Japan Nikkei Entertainment Magazine: The 20 Most Popular Asian Actress - No.12
  • 2003 FHM Singapore Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 15
  • 2003 FHM Thailand Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 10
  • 2003 Singapore magazineFriday Weekly Students' Idol Poll:"Most Popular Chinese Actress"
  • 2002 South Korea DAMN website Most Popular Asian Commercial Star: Second Place - Zhao Wei (First for non-Korean)
  • 2002 FHM Singapore Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 2


Fashion Awards

edit
  • 2007 China MTV Style Awards for Most Stylist Female Artist
  • 2007 China Fashion Awards for Most Trendy Actress
  • 2005 China Fashion Awards for Most Trendy Actress
  • 2005 China Fashion Awards for Most Trendy Female Artist
  • 2004 China MTV Style Awards for Most Stylist Atress
  • 2003 China Fashion Awards for Most Trendy Actress
  • 2003 China MTV Style Awards for Most Stylist Atress

Other Honors

edit
  • 2010 China Mobile "Golden π Awards" for Favorite Actress of 2009
  • 2009 Sohu Annual Awards 2008: Box office figure of the year
  • 2009 China Mobile "Golden π Awards" for Favorite Actress of 2008
  • 2009 China magazine BQ Magazine Most Shining One Forever Event: Favorite Female Star
  • 2008 China Mobile "Golden π Awards" for Favorite Actress of 2007
  • 2008 30 Years of Glamorous TV Series Gala: The Most Influential Actress
  • 2008 Ent.163.com survey: The most popular female arts school celebrity
  • 2008 Ent.163.com survey: one of the Top 10 credibility celebrities
  • 2006 US People Magazine "100 World Most Beautiful People"
  • 2006 FHM Thailand Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 28
  • 2005 FHM Thailand Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 15
  • 2004 FHM Singapore Edition "100 Sexiest Women in the World":Rank 2

References

edit

There is a serious lack of citations in many areas of this article, esp. the awards section. I attempted to add citations in all of the areas, but the awards section is particularly long. I was wondering if anyone would be willing to help with that by finding Zhao Wei articles as sources. The discography section could also use some citations and maybe a little more length? Lulu288 15:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

  Some references, please added into the article
    1.The 10th Movie Academic Society Prize - Golden Phoenix Award
     http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-08/08/content_3325037.htm
    2.Channel V Chinese Music Awards - Most Popular Female Artist 
      http://www.zhaoweinetfamily.com/en/news20060112-1
    3.The 12th East Music Awards - Best Stage Performance
     http://ent.sina.com.cn/y/2005-03-20/0015680776.html
    4.The 5th Pepsi Music Chart Awards - Mainland's Most Popular Female Singer 
      http://ent.sina.com.cn/y/2005-03-20/2011681175.html
     5."The Most Trendy Female Actress (Mainland)" - Lycra Channel Young Award 
    http://ent.sina.com.cn/2003-10-24/2232220790.html
     6.MTV Style Awards - Best Multitalented Female Artist of the Year  
     http://ent.sina.com.cn/s/2004-11-21/2316574075.html
     7."The most style Asia Actress" in MTV-China 
     http://ent.sina.com.cn/s/m/2003-11-29/2131242956.html
 i will add more later.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vivitaki (talkcontribs) .

The Awards Section

edit

Yes, the awards section...besides the lack of citations, I was wondering what all of your opinions were on whether or not we should remove the awards section all together. I was thinking that instead of having one long list (which looks somewhat sloppy). If you look at Featured Articles, such as Angelina Jolie, the awards are not listed out, but spread throughout the article. For example, in the "other notes" section of the filmography, we could include awards Zhao Wei won for her role in that film. And we could comment on her awards in her "career"...

So what do you all think? Keep the section or spread the information throughout the article? Lulu288 23:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

More Photos

edit

I think this article needs more photos...first of all, a photo in the infobox would be helpful, and also some pics of her on magazines, etc. Lulu288 01:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


     There are lots photo of her at www.fotki.com/biogirl please feel free to use those    
     picture if needed for this article. Also please update  2003-Present" smf "Charity"       
     sections as she just won "Most Popular Actress" at 14th Annual Beijing University Student 
     Film Festival for her role in "Longest Night in ShangHai", which she auctioned later for
     1.08 million yuan to contibute to funding for Chinldren with Disabilities. 
    Sources: 
    the award: http://ent.sina.com.cn/m/c/2007-04-29/16061539086.html
    enlgish article: http://www.zhaoweinetfamily.com/en/news20070429-1
    the auction: http://ent.sina.com.cn/s/m/2007-05-22/07501563606.html
    english article: http://www.zhaoweinetfamily.com/en/news20070517-2

GA nomination

edit

I have passed this article as a GA under the GA Criteria. However, I should point out that is was a close call - although I could find no obvious failures from the GA Criteria (WP:GA?), my opinion is that the article is unpleasant to the eye (particularly after the introductory paragraph) and that it needs to be tidied up. Otherwise, not bad and well done to the main editors! Regards, Anthonycfc [TC] 16:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Zhaowei-piao.jpg

edit
 

Image:Zhaowei-piao.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Delisting

edit

  In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of January 15, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

  1. The tone of this article is poor and unencyclopedic in some sections. The biggest problem is the present tense verbs when discussing the past. An example from "Rise to prominence, 1998-2002": "However, Zhao feels her role in Shaolin Soccer was also a learning experience for her." This is tied directly to the fact that too many direct quotes are used — when her own words are not important, and the idea can be summed up (and in many cases it can, as it has been done immediately before the quote), the direct quotes should be removed — they are to be used sparingly. Overall, the prose overall needs some work and a proper copyedit
  2. Some statements require citations:
    "Zhao's performance received critical acclaim in Taiwan as well; Zhao was named as one of Taiwan's "Top Ten Most Outstanding Individuals in Television Industry." Following this, she continually to star in a number of successful television series and movies and released a number of well-sold albums." (Rise to prominence, 1998-2002)
    "The film, directed by Corey Yuen, was relatively successful, mostly because of its three female leads." (Rise to prominence, 1998-2002) Reads like speculation or original research without a cite.
    "Critics and magazines regularly rate Zhao as one of the most successful actresses in the contemporary Chinese acting industry." (Stardom, 2003-present) Speculative, OR or non-NPOV without a cite
    "In 2006, Zhao took an exam for a Masters' class in directing at her alma mater, Beijing Film Academy. After passing with flying colors, Zhao returned to Beijing Film Academy in September 2006 as a graduate student in the Directing Department. Currently, she is studying under the instruction of the famed director Tian Zhuangzhuang." (Stardom, 2003-present) The only time "passing with flying colors" should be used on Wikipedia is if we started an article on flying colors.
    "Because of this, the media criticized Zhao as the "bane of the box office", or "box office poison."" (Rumours and controversy) Direct quotes require direct citations
    "Zhao was awarded the "Stylish Female Singer and Stylish Actress" at the China Fashion Award (CFA) in 2005." (Commercial work)
  3. "Stardom, 2003-present" is not a very neutral heading title
  4. All one-two sentence paragraphs should be either expanded or merged with the surrounding paragraphs, as they detract from the prose and disrupt from the flow
  5. The lead does not effectively meet WP:LEAD's requirements that the lead adequately summarize all major points/headings made in the body of the article. As just one example, there's little, if anything, on the "Personal life" section.

Cheers, CP 04:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Zhaowei-double.jpg

edit
 

Image:Zhaowei-double.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image File:Jade Goddess of Mercy.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Zhao Wei/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It seems well-researched, and well-written, but I cannot rate it higher than B, because it has not gone through a GAC review.--Yannismarou 08:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 08:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Zhao Wei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of statement=

edit

I believe the statement "She is also regarded as China's Four Dan Actresses alongside Zhou Xun, Zhang Ziyi and Xu Jinglei." in Zhao Wei's article is true, even though there aren't any sources linked to it yet. @Chinese Aladdin: Why do you keep removing the sentence?

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Zhao Wei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Confusing sentence

edit

This sentence is confusing: "The film also achieved commercial success, and became the only film to gross 100 million yuan in both Taiwan and mainland China." Did it get 100 million yuan in each of the places or together? Also, is this in Chinese RMB? The linked reference cannot be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.92.187.241 (talk) at 22:16, 1 September 2021‎ (UTC)Reply

Balance?

edit

I don't spend much time on Wiki anymore, but there used to be a rule about unfair balance or unfair weighting, something like that. If it still exists, someone should assess the size and content of the Controversy section here. --NoApostropheInIts (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Introduction is too long

edit

The introduction for this article is unusually long. Does her introduction really need 7 paragraphs? If anyone can help trim or move some things around, please do. Vixtani (talk) 14:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply