Talk:Your Body (Christina Aguilera song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 19:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

General overview

Disambiguation links

• Not present.

External links

• Some external links to be corrected, per Checklinks, including a dead link.

•  Done I have corrected the links

Original research

• Did not find any instance.

References: style, date and details

• Could you set the list template to width 3? ({{reflist|3}})
• FN3, unlike other Billboard references, lists Nielsen Business Media as its publisher. Could you please replace it with Prometheus Global Media?
• FN8 and FN9 — I'm aware that Radio and Records used to be a printed magazine, though, is it still acceptable to italicize it?
• FN11 could link Amazon.com.
• FN12 has iTunes Store italicized; United Kingdom, here, can be substituted with (GB) per the link.
• FN15 has The Huffington Post italicized, where it should not be (see The Huffington Post).

•  Done I have fixed the references, except The Huffington Post is italicized (per the original article) — Simon (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Prose

Lead section

• "Lyrically, it discusses anonymous sex, where Aguilera wants a one-night stand with a random man." → How about something like... "Its lyrics see Aguilera expressing her desire of having sex with an anonymous partner." I'm open to other suggestions, though that "where" does not fit in that sentence.
• "On December 4, Fuse announced that "Your Body" was the best video of the year, based on readers' poll online." → I find this unnecessary. Could you substitute this with a sentence about Aguilera's performance at Jimmy Fallon's show ("To promote it, [...]").

•  Done

Background

• "Billboard writer" → "Writing for the same publication, (...)"
• "Martin has been working" → "Martin had been working"
• Could you try and replace the third repetition of Billboard with something else?

•  Done

Release and artwork

• "Many refer to this explicit version of the song as "Fuck Your Body"." — Unsourced?

•  Fixed

• "f***" Wikipedia is not censored. As you copied that from the original source, please add {{sic}} after the word.

•  Done

• "the single was sent to contemporary hit rhythmic radio stations" → "the single was serviced to contemporary hit and rhythmic radio stations (...)"

•  Done

• "available for digital sales" → "available via digital retailers"

• I fixed it as "available via iTunes Stores worldwide for digital download"

• "The CD single of the single" → "The CD single for "Your Body""

•  Done

• I don't think Neon Limelight is a magazine, am I wrong?

• However it was a source for an information that existed on Wikipedia:Did you know? nominated by User:Status and User:FanofPopMusic, so I think it is a WP:RS — Simon (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• "compared Aguilera's image on the artwork to Marilyn Monroe's photo shoot" → "compared Aguilera's image on the artwork to that of Marilyn Monroe, on the photoshoot ..."

•  Done

• Please add {{-}} at the end of the section.

•  Done — Simon (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Composition and lyrical interpretation

• Isn't "and lyrical interpretation" unnecessary?

•  Done

• "The chorus and the bridge features" → remove 's' from feature

•  Done

• The Michigan Daily's part here is subjective, therefore, it should be in Critical reception.

•  Done

Critical reception

• Why isn't Entertainment Weekly wikilinked?

• It was previously linked in "Composition" section

Live performances

• Logically, it should be in the singular form. The change is optional, though.

• Uhm, Aguilera only performed once, so I think it should be singular

Release history

• You can link CD single.

•  Done — Simon (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments

• I love this song, and I couldn't help myself but to review the article for it. Considering these are just a few comments, I'll give you a week to resolve them, though I will give you more time by request. Thank you! prism △ 19:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Outcome

List-checking

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Congratulations! prism △ 11:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)