Talk:XM312

Cyclic rate

The anonymous editor from IP address 24.22.95.227 keeps changing the cyclic rate of fire spec. on this weapon from 230 to 260 rpm. The latest data sheet from the manufacturer specifies 230 rpm, so unless this is pure vandalism, please could that person explain why they have better data than the manufacturer? Riddley 22:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

230? It's really that low? Wow. I can get a cyclic rate at least that high firing a Barrett semi-auto (230 per minute is less than 4 per second, and I can pull a trigger at least that fast). A weapon that fires that slowly is really supposed to replace the M2HB? — Red XIV ^(talk) 03:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

In response to Redxiv, I highly doubt it will. This is supposed to be a modern machine gun, one that surpasses the impressive record of the M2. The military wouldn't settle for anything that doesn't beat the M2 in all ways (just like the M8 not beating the pants off of the M16). Thats why I'm suggesting we remove the text claiming it will until we find a recent (within the past six months at least) source that states the XM312 will replace the M2. Paladin Hammer (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Obivous problems with the adoption date.

According to the text under the picture, the XM312 is expected to be deployed in 2008, and is (according to the text in a picture in the gallery) expected to replace the M2. However, the article clearly states in the top that it is unlikely to be adopted due to its incredibly low rate of fire (230-260 rounds a minute, which by the way needs to stop changing). This is incredibly misleading and confusing. I suggest we remove the text that states it will replace the M2 in 2008 in both pictures until we find a reliable source that states it will, one that can override the current source that states its unlikely.

Anyone agree?

Paladin Hammer (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I'm removing it.

Liger14 (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.149.28 (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

There was a recent article at DefenseNews.com talking about Picatinny's latest Lightweight 50 (LW50) machinegun solicitation. While not mentioned specificly by name, it is clear that the discussion of GDATP's potential entry is describing the XM312. http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3398495&c=AME&s=LAN

D.E. Watters (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The program was belatedly cancelled in 2007. Gordon Rottman, "Browning .50-Caliber Machine Guns," Osprey, UK, 2010. The 312 failed tests in 2005. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btillman (talk • contribs) 23:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XM312. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061010203855/http://www.eucom.mil/english/FullStory.asp?art=725 to http://www.eucom.mil/english/FullStory.asp?art=725

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on XM312. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100213225849/http://rodgers.smartvideochannel.com:80/media/playvideo.aspx?f=flash7&cid=241C97BA634C4EA38522E63059B39D9B&v=mostviewed to http://rodgers.smartvideochannel.com/media/playvideo.aspx?f=flash7&cid=241C97BA634C4EA38522E63059B39D9B&v=mostviewed
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080724164408/http://idr.janes.com/public/idr/index.shtml to http://idr.janes.com/public/idr/index.shtml
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110606131039/http://www.gdatp.com/files/PDF/A076_XM312.pdf to http://www.gdatp.com/files/PDF/A076_XM312.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927000253/http://www.gdatp.com/products/Gun_Systems/XM37K50/XM307K50.htm to http://www.gdatp.com/products/Gun_Systems/XM37K50/XM307K50.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)