Talk:Works of Erasmus
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Rick Jelliffe in topic Split from Erasmus
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Split from Erasmus
editThis article was created by splitting out two sections from Erasmus due to excessive length. See Talk:Erasmus#Splitting_proposal
I believe there is no need for the header about use of previous material, as that affects the Erasmus article not the newer material here.Rick Jelliffe (talk) 00:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I have copied over some of the header information for the talk. For the WikiProject tag, I have kept the importance rankings (Mid, Mid, Top) and assessment (B) from the original page, however, it may be that these need to be re-assessed.Rick Jelliffe (talk) 01:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)