Talk:Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Protection Act

Latest comment: 11 years ago by HistoricMN44 in topic Notability

Notability

edit

One editor briefly questioned the notability of this article. In response, I have added five additional sources, including newspaper articles from widely known papers such as The Hill (newspaper). I would also like to point out that this article is about a piece of U.S. federal legislation that has passed the House of Representatives - only a very small percentage of introduced bills do that. I personally believe that should grant the article the benefit of a doubt. If you disagree, I'd be happy to discuss it with you and others. Thanks. HistoricMN44 (talk) 15:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply