Talk:Women's Appreciation/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ruby2010 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 22:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will review this soon. BTW, I've been meaning to try and work on season 2 of The Office for awhile, as its my favorite.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Image: I think this is very important to the article, but I would beef up the FUR rationale on the image page
  • Plot: I would add the characters full names and add who played them after their names appear
  • Plot: "He concludes by offering..." -> "He closes the meeting by offering..." (I just associated 'concludes' with thinking and it was a hair confusing)
  • Plot: mustache and moustache are used. I'd use one type
  • Reception: I don't think the episode was an hour. It looks like it came on after "My Name is Earl", which was also supersized, at 7:36, so I think the episode was 36 minutes long (Or possible 43, as one reviewer claimed)
  • Reception: "It attracted an estimated 7.0 million viewers,[9] and ranked fourth in its timeslot (behind episodes of Survivor: Fiji, Ugly Betty, and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?).[10]" -> "It attracted an estimated 7.0 million viewers,[9] and ranked fourth in its timeslot, behind episodes of Survivor: Fiji, Ugly Betty, and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?.[10]"

Those are the only issues. Minor nitpickings. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

All hopefully addressed. Thanks for the review. Ruby 2010/2013 03:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
And in reply to expanding second season articles, you should! I'm particarily fond of the third season, but it'd be great if all older episodes got to GA status eventually. Most need a lot of work. Ruby 2010/2013 03:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Everything looks grand. A good chunk of the season two GAs are poorly sourced as they are, so I might start by beefing those up first. This, however, will pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 18:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply