Talk:Wisk Cora

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Should this be an article about the aircraft the company or both? Do we need two articles?

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Someone already suggested to change the subject of the article from aircraft to the company which produces it. What do you think about it? --Leo067 (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

There is already an article on the company Wisk Aero

The description of this aircraft as a gyrodyne is certainly not correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:87F0:9690:F976:150A:8C07:300C (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I disagree that the description as a gyrodyne is inaccurate. It may be unconventional, but it certainly meets the criteria as defined at the Gyrodyne article; it has a helicopter-like rotor system (people often forget that multicopters are a type of helicopter) for VTOL flight, as well as a propeller for forward thrust. That said, the cited source does not refer to the Cora as a gyrodyne, so its classification as one is original research. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic