Talk:Wieferich prime/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   What does "≡" means? If and only if? And "∤" means "restriction to"?

   "≡" in the context of this article denotes a congruence on the integers. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

   "∤" here means "does not divide" (it is listed at List of mathematical symbols#Symbols). -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

   I wikilinked the symbol "∤" to an article where it is explained. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

   "log log x" a word too much or intentional?

   This is intentional. It denotes the logarithm of the logarithm of x. I added parentheses for clarity here. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

   Similar uncommon units should be linked

   What in particular do you think should be linked? -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

   Can you explain what does the small omega in the second table refers to? If you do this I am happy to pass this article.

   Explained in this edit. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

   Red links should be created or explained in the article (for example, I don't know what a "Catalan pseudoprime" is)

   Redlinks First case of Fermat's last theorem and Catalan pseudoprime eliminated by creating those articles. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

   Non-english sources should be labelled as such.

   Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

   Suggest to remove the red links in the reference section, as it is unlikely they will be created.

   Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Overall ok

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: On hold to give you time fixing the problems.--GoP_T^C_N 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Pass

   Pass/Fail:

(Note): My common practice is to paste the template into the GAN. I often check points 5 and 6 (stability and pictures) before reviewing because they are easy to check. "Neutral" is confusing, as it may also mean that I did not review this points. Ok, now I will resume my review :)--GoP_T^C_N 11:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)