Talk:Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Original movie poster for the film Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.jpg

Image:Original movie poster for the film Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LizDick3.jpg

Image:LizDick3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Office reference?

Is the Office episode really a "reference" to the film? It sounds pretty tenuously related to me (haven't seen the episode, and it's been a while since I last saw the film). If so, the connection should be explained more explicitly. - dcljr (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

dingbat

(Mad magazine ref) terribly minor point ... but symbols used to represent profanity (e.g. $%?) aren't technically dingbats, which is a printing term for non-standard graphics used to fill blank page-space. I'd love to know if there is a correct term for this profanity representation, and my research skills aren't up to the task. I suspect the proper term (predating the well known typeface)is wingdings 131.172.99.15 (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)snaxalotl

Those are grawlixes (or maybe grawlices?)

See http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/The_Lexicon_of_Comicana WHPratt (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

the plot

I wish i knew what the plot was. i have never seen the play. johno95 (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I added a plot synopsis that's longer than I prefer, but I feel this is the type of film you either summarize in a couple of sentences or discuss at length. Once you start with a detailed account, it's difficult to decide what to eliminate. If someone wants to trim it, please feel free to do so. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 18:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Filming.

Most of the movie was shot on Warner Brothers sound stages in Burbank, as referenced on IMDB's filming locations page for this title. Accordingly, I've modified the sentence which seemed to imply that it was shot entirely on location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.115.228 (talk) 20:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

the statement that the play was kept intact is a falsehood

many of Martha’s monologues are excised in the film including her 3 page monologue at the top of Act 3 “daddy red eyes “ in the film she enters and goes right into the end of the section with clink clink other monologues have been clipped in the film 2601:700:8000:B790:CB2:E8E9:A7E8:E23D (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

"Entangled"?

Under the heading "Plot", the two final sentences of the first paragraph read "As the four drink, Martha and George engage in scathing verbal abuse in front of Nick and Honey. The younger couple is first embarrassed and later entangled. "Embarrassed" is perfectly reasonable. "Entangled" is nonsensical. In literary terms, "entangled" describes a condition in which characters find themselves, not an emotional reaction to an incident. There must be a better way to describe this portion of the plot. Bricology (talk) 09:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

The sentence does describe a condition in which these characters find themselves. Nick and Honey are initially embarrassed (emotional reaction) by Martha and George's arguing; as the plot develops (later) they are drawn into the squabbling (condition in which they find themselves). It seems a perfectly good way to describe the outline their plot arc. Captainllama (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)