Talk:Where Adam Stood

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

A clarification is needed to avoid spreading misinformation and prejudice.

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Philip Henry Gosse's book, Omphalos: an attempt to untie the geological knot, was published in 1857, two years prior to the 1859 publication of Darwin's On the Origin of Species. Gosse was not attempting to reconcile the geology of Charles Lyell to a Biblical account of creation. Gosse's cosmological model bore little resemblance to the Genesis creation narrative. Gosse was not attempting to prove the antiquity of the earth or argue a case for Young Earth Creationism.

   In Gosse's own words:

"I will not rule the actual date at all; you, my geological friend, shall settle the chronology just as you please, or if you like it better, we will leave the chronological date out of the inquiry, as an element not relevant to it. It may have been six hundred years ago, or six thousand, or sixty times six million; let it for the present remain an indeterminate quantity. Only please remember that the day was a reality, whether we can fix it or not; it was as precise a moment as the moment in which I write this word" (Omphalos, page 127).

    In another passage Gosse wrote:

"I wish it to be distinctly understood that I am not proving the exact or approximate antiquity of the globe we inhabit. I am not attempting to show that it has existed for no more than six thousand years. I wish this to be distinctly stated, because I am sure I shall meet with many opponents unfair enough, or illogical enough, to misrepresent or misunderstand my argument, and sound the trumpet of victory, because I cannot demonstrate that. All I set myself to do is to invalidate the testimony of the witness relied on for the indefinitely remote antiquity; to show that in a very large and important field of nature, evidence exactly analogous to that relied on would inevitably lead to a false conclusion, and must, therefore, be rejected, or received only contingently; received only as indicative of probability, and that only in the absence of any positive witness to the contrary (Omphalos, page 339). 2600:8801:BE26:2700:B09F:3FEF:E7EB:2AC5 (talk) 00:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC) J.J.E.Reply

Add topic