Talk:Wave disk engine
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Michigan may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | It is requested that a diagram or diagrams of a combustion engine be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2011. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
News Release Tag
editThis article should be expanded/rewritten to contain a reasonably detailed description of the technology in question, a meaningful comparison with other similar technologies, etc. Currently it reads more like PR puff. 24.79.211.192 (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There's been stories videos of this circulating for a few years now (eg. [1]), all promising a working engine "by year's end". If it was a guy in a shed we'd be thinking "scammer".87.221.151.214 (talk) 20:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'd recommend that the Coates Engine technology (rotary valve system) be considered when considering alternative technologies. This one works and is real, but IIRC has challenges in meeting EPA NOx emissions - - I suspect that the cause is likely to be the same as here, namely higher combusion temperatures. -hh (talk) 14:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
to be fair, the ZDnet article linked above was written in 2009 and claimed that a car could be ready in two years, which is consistent with the "end of 2011" estimate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.109.34 (talk) 20:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
source material for History section
editNorbert Mueller, mentioned on this page, has previously published an overview and history (which goes back to the 1940's) of wave rotor engines. [2] Pie fed (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Rewrite
editI just rewrote and reformatted this article to make it sound less like a press release. Removed lots of "utilize" and "teams" talk which which didn't "synergize" well. Not much actual information on the engine itself, but the general principals are there, so it may be worthwhile to keep this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nailedtooth (talk • contribs) 15:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Vote(s) against deletion
editI would like to see this article expanded, not deleted. The Michigan State University Arpa-E grant has generated a lot of PR about this type of engine. Wikipedia should have some explanation of what it is. Elizabeth Greene 9 April, 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.52.244.134 (talk) 01:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Wrong place. Your vote won't be counted here. Got to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave disk engine and vote there. Guy Macon (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Dubious
editThe article includes the following statement: "The very first type of wave rotor was developed in the 1950s." However, according to page 720 this source:
- Akbari, Pezhman; Nalim, Razi; Mueller, Norbert (2006). "A Review of Wave Rotor Technology and Its Applications" (PDF). Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. pp. 717–735. Retrieved 2011-04-10.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
a wave rotor was designed by the Brown Boveri Company in the 1940s, with tests performed 1941–43. Regards, RJH (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Wave disk engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131010040052/http://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=arpa-e-news-item/arpa-e-awardees-selected-nsf-innovation-corps-program to http://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=arpa-e-news-item/arpa-e-awardees-selected-nsf-innovation-corps-program
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
No news is Good news?
editLast hit for any real news on this thing is 2013. I'm assuming that this means that they hit some sort of problem that only government funding could attempt to solve since private investors would run away. How do we wrap this up? Here's a good summary on an absence of progress and reasons for it http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2013/09/04/arpa-e-backing-the-msu-wave-disk-engine/ Greglocock (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
What is the temperature of the shockwave in the engine?
editCan't find it anywhere. Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)