Talk:Water buffalo incident

Latest comment: 27 days ago by AnonMoos in topic Refinement of Kafka-esqueness

Notability Tag

edit

Shouldn't this be folded into the University's article? =David(talk)(contribs) 15:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't think it should. The incident itself is relatively notable, and received a lot of press attention. I've heard it singled out since then, as a prime example of well-meaning legislation or rulemaking run amok. Although the incident involves the University of Pennsylvania, it's not about the university, and thus should be on a separate page. –Kadin2048 20:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

What did he actually say?

edit

Did he say beheima, or did he say water buffalo? The way I heard the story is that he said beheima, and they looked it up in the dictionary and found that it meant water buffalo. If that is the case, the article should be corrected in accordance. --Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.115.53 (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Right, because the first thing black people do when they're upset at being scolded for being noisy is run and grab a Hebrew dictionary -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.213.142.170 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
What I remember at the time is that he said it in English.
By the way, one reason why the case ultimately went down in flames was that everybody who lied got off scot-free, while Jacobowitz was put through a whole long excruciating ordeal for telling the truth (not the most inspiring example of the use of campus investigations and proceedings...). AnonMoos (talk) 09:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

2021

edit
What did they lie about? -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.123.84.97 (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
About whether or not they had yelled down at the Black students. AnonMoos (talk) 01:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

what has this got to do with anything?

edit

Small town Picayune gossip columns shouldn't be included as standalone main articles in an encyclopaedic work. This is written in a reactionary tone as well, and should either be linked to a larger theme (free speech, PC, etc) or folded into a larger main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.42.100 (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

As you can see from the footnotes, this event merited a full article in NYTimes and is the subject of a scholarly book from a major publishing house. Definitely more than a nothing event that only mattered in the local tabloids or school papers. DMacks (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shadow University paragraph

edit

I don't have the full facts necessary to clarify the following exchange, but it seems nonsensical to me as stated:

"Was the statement racist?"
"The issue is not whether I have or not..."

Can somebody fix it? 108.1.70.95 (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also noticed that... AnonMoos (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Here's the original at http://www.shadowuniv.com/excerpts-wb1.html -- AnonMoos (talk) 20:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

On NBC Nightly News, Sara James asked Larry Moneta, "Have you ever heard of 'water buffalo' being used as a racial slur?" He replied: "The issue is not whether I have or not. The issue is also, you know, language in my mind is neutral. It's a question of the context in which is language is used."42 (Two years later, when Penn abolished its speech code, the same Larry Moneta would dutifully go before the media to declare that "At Penn, all speech is free.")

Limbaugh

edit

According to Will Bunch in his book about US tertiary education, Rush Limbaugh fanned the flames of this issue, keeping it a national ïssue. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:71AF:59EB:AAF8:AC69 (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you're trying to imply that only hard-right conservatives had problems with UPenn's handling of the case, then that's quite false. AnonMoos (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Refinement of Kafka-esqueness

edit

Should mention that at one point the University imposed a gag order on Jacobowitz and Kors, then publicly denied that it had imposed a gag order. This was kind of symbolic of the University's whole bizarre and inherently rigged approach, which could have given Kafka some pointers... AnonMoos (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply