Talk:Vortex coronagraph

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vortex coronagraph article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Once this has been resolved, please remove the `\|attention=yes` parameter from this template.

Embarrassment

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article says absolutely nothing about how vortex (or any other coronagraphs) work. Someone should delete it; it's an embarrassment. Verdana♥Bøld 23:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

It's explained in Optical vortex Sisima70 (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Don't Delete! Improve!

The article is not great, but better than nothing. One of the weaknesses is that the references are mostly behind paywalls. An exception is https://www.eso.org/sci/publications/messenger/archive/no.152-jun13/messenger-no152-8-13.pdf so I'll start reading that. PeterGrecian (talk)

Add topic