Vision Australia Radio is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
Vision Australia Radio is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
An impartial editor has reviewed the proposed edit(s) and asked the editor with a conflict of interest to go ahead and make the suggested changes.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
HiLo48, I am querying a potential conflict of interest issue, though I may be over-reacting, as I am very new to Wikipedia editing. Looking at this talk page template created by the wizard, it appears that I should have requested my changes here before making them in the article, but I don't think they are drastic enough for it to matter that much. I am only concerned as I am a past volunteer for the not-for-profit organisation and radio network in question.
QUALITY: ensure short description actually makes sense by fixing typo.
QUALITY: Add Link to main vision Australia organisation in frontmatter.
FIX: Update Webcast link to something more up-to-date as the old MP3 .pls playlist no longer appears to work.
QUALITY: Clarify Victoria in Australia but without linking to the latter to hopefully avoid copyediting issues. Remove explicit reference to NSW to help avoid article imbalance and simply generally observe other states in Australia as this is more accurate.
QUALITY: remove internally linked popularly-identifiable references to newspapers and magazines to avoid over-linking.
FIX: Remove adjective “dedicated” with reference to employees as this creates too much bias towards entities affiliated with the Organisation running the station.
QUALITY: clarify Kooyong with internally-linked ref. Do the same for some of the mentioned disabilities.
@Njsch: Thanks for your contributions. Your edits look perfect. For my part, I don't consider a former volunteer for this not-for-profit precludes you from editing or requires a declaration/edit request each time you edit the page. Minor edits of this nature need not trouble you at all - you can just go ahead and do them. I also note it seems you are not subject to the paid editing disclosure requirement as a former volunteer. Given your former association, just be mindful of ensuring that your contributions are written in a neutral point of view. If you intend to (1) make changes that may sound promotional in tone, or (2) remove material that might be contentious, then you might seek assistance then. Thank you for editing and welcome to Wikipedia. Local Variable (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply