Vince Villanucci has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 7, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links
editGA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Vince Villanucci/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 00:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
I figured I ought to review a couple of these. Should be done over the next few days. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Generalissima: Do you think you'll be able to complete it before the end of the WikiCup? Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Criterion 1: Prose
edit- Lede solid, though it might be good to note that he was specifically a high school coach.
- Early life generally good.
- I think the commas in the sentence beginning Villanucci also won the Golden Helmet award are unnecessary.
- College, Professional career, Coaching, and Personal life sections all good.
Criterion 2: Sourcing
edit- Citations are inconsistent on whether news agencies are cited or not. "All-MAC Team" is UPI, but not credited as such. Meanwhile, "CFL moves" is Canadian Press and does have an agency cited. There should be consistency one way or another here.
Source check to come.
- I checked each of the newspaper sources and couldn't find anything errant. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Criterion 3: Breadth
editSeems like a well-scoped article to me considering the available sources.
Criterion 4: Neutral
editYep.
Criterion 5: Stable
editAs far as I can see.
Criterion 6: Imaged
editNo possibility of a fair-use image, since he's deceased? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Generalissima and BeanieFan11:, it looks like all the comments have been addressed (the citations and the commas). I have also added a non-free image. Are there any other comments or issues? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh thank you! Everything looks good to me. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.