Talk:Veil Nebula
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Distance and Radius
editOK, I added distance and radius. The data to be found on the net varies widely. The age is from 20'000 to 5'000 years, the distance is from 1'500 to 2'500 and the radius should vary by the same percentage as the distance. This is the problem with facts - the latest facts: 5'000 years and 1'500 ly are from Nasa/Hubble and probably pretty fresh, but are they reliable? A thorough supervision on sources would be required. Rursus 21:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
NGC Identification
editI added this note to talk:Cygnus Loop and figured it should go here too. The Sinbad location for NGC 6960 (and the labels on all the star atlases, including Uranometria) correspond to the Western Veil Nebula -- but the article (before I edited it) treated NGC 6960 as a designation for the entire loop. Is this a case of the 1st number in R.A. being applied to the whole? Is there a clear reference for that? -- Elphion (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Veil Nebula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121211084134/http://fuse.pha.jhu.edu/wpb/sci_cyglpstar.html to http://fuse.pha.jhu.edu/wpb/sci_cyglpstar.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823112950/http://www.aao.gov.au/images/captions/int008.html to http://www.aao.gov.au/images/captions/int008.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)