Talk:V1369 Centauri
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Detection of Lithium
editThe detection of Lithium in this nova is no first. In Classical nova explosions are major lithium factories in the universe, the discovery of Lithium is reported in Nova Delphi 2013, which occured in August 2013. The report was published in February 2015, before the study about Nova Centauri 2013. The source is mistaken.Renerpho (talk) 03:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- The detection in Nova Delphi 2013 was a detection of Beryllium 7, which decays to Lithium 7. So production of Lithium was inferred from the presence of Beryllium 7. However an actual spectral transition of Lithium itself was seen in Nova Centauri 2013, so I think the claim in the article is technically correct.[1]PopePompus (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Rukeya, Rejiefu; Lü, Guoliang; Wang, Zhaojun; Zhu, Chunhua (July 2017). "Novae Contribution to the Galactic Lithium Enhancement". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 129 (977). doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa6b4d. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
Requested move 6 January 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. No opposition. (closed by non-admin page mover) MarioJump83! 04:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Nova Centauri 2013 → V1369 Centauri – Most of the other articles on novae are named by the variable star designation, rather than the "Nova (constellation) (year)" format. I believe the Wikipedia articles about novae should be named in a consistent manner. The variable star designation is almost universally used in astronomical literature. Also, the "Nova (constellation) (year)" naming convention is not used consistently when there is more than one nova within a particular constellation during a single year (you will see "Nova Scorpii 2007 #1", "Nova Scorpii 2007 A", etc), but the variable star designation is unambiguous. I realize there is already a redirect page, but I think that's a kludgy solution, because the title of the page remains nonstandard, according to WP:STARNAMES, preference #4. PopePompus (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.