Untitled

edit

The objective way of showing importance is the citations to a persons work. I do not know why it was removed. The information was not expressed correctly--it should have linked to the actual GS information , not to a report of it elsewhere, and it should not have been in the lede. I changed it aroundto the way we always do it. I also fixed up a good deal of detail. DGG ( talk ) 23:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply