This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This is a good, informative article, but the information on haplogroup distribution is misleading. It states that "the Hualapai is the only modern group that carries both lineages found at Upward Sun River", which is patently false; B2 is found all over the New World and C1b, though much patchier and relatively rare north of Mexico, is also very widely distributed, so they must overlap in many populations. For instance, the Shuswap of British Columbia (considerably closer to Alaska than the Hualapai) have both B2 and C1b. Numbers like "6 tribes" or "37 tribes" are quite meaningless out of context. I am going to remove these statements and replace them with more general and accurate phrasing. 70.75.233.253 (talk) 00:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I agree: after doing a bit more research, I've noticed that the relevant Haplogroups are a lot more widespread, especially in South America - I've removed the bad information. Thanks! Fraenir (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
