Talk:United Kingdom in the Korean War

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --

Korean War article don't have the detailed information about United Kingdom in the Korean War.

Please check out article thoroughly - the Korean War and United Kingdom in the Korean War. (For example: order of battle, statistics about MIA, Wounded and so on.)

According to your logic, Do I delete Canada in the Korean War, Australia in the Korean War and so on? Footwiks (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I concur, at least use the talk page before considering deletion. I will remove the header until there is a consensus. Eastfarthingan (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

@Eastfarthingan I'm CSDing these articles under the same reasoning in South Korea in the Korean War (view history). I'd be happy to bring it to AfD instead though. :3 F4U (they/it) 17:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

If the reason why this article is being considered for deletion is that it is not ready for the article namespace then can it be moved to draft? Smahwk (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

As Footwiks has said (with no response) According to your logic, why hasn't Canada in the Korean War, Australia in the Korean War been deleted in the same way. Eastfarthingan (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

@Eastfarthingan Because they do not fall under the CSD A10 criteria, in that they do not duplicate already existing mainspace articles. At the moment all three of these articles are suitable for mainspace and should be draftified. :3 F4U (they/it) 17:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

In that case perhaps Footwiks can add Template:Under construction instead? Footwiks is content still being added? Eastfarthingan (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

From the template page, In general, this template should not be used for new articles with little or no content. Instead, the sandbox should be used to develop the article so that it has reasonable content when it is copied into mainspace. :3 F4U (they/it) 18:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Belows are sources and I provided new informatin about Korean War in English Wikipedia. That is to say, Most information in this article is the new information which don't have in existing English Wikipedia article about Korean War.

• The Statistics of the Korean War - ROK Ministry of National Defense Institute for Military History, 2014 (E-BOOK) (in Korean)
• The History of the UN Forces in the Korean War-1 ( ETHIOPIA, PHILIPPINES, SOUTH AFRICA, THAILAND, TURKEY) - ROK Ministry of National Defense Institute for Military History, 1972 (E-BOOK)
• The History of the UN Forces in the Korean War-2 (AUSTRALIA, CANADA, INDIA, NEW ZEALAND, UNITED KINGDOM) - ROK Ministry of National Defense Institute for Military History, 1981 (E-BOOK)
• The History of the UN Forces in the Korean War-3 (BELGIUM, COLOMBIA, FRANCE, GREECE, LUXEMBOURG, NETHERLANDS, DENMARK, ITALY, NORWAY, SWEDEN) - ROK Ministry of National Defense Institute for Military History, 1974 (E-BOOK)

For example, Order of Battle of UK Forces, I inspected all battalions and Aircraft carriers, Cruisers, Destroyers, Frigates, Sloops and so on.Footwiks (talk) 18:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)