This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The British service section here contains information from DANFS about the schooner, USS Asp, which would be better utilized on a page on that ship. If there are no objections, I propose to summarize it here and move it to a new page on the Asp. Also, there is a chunk of information about the Battle of the Rappahannock River, which really ought to be in the article on that event, not here. I will move that, also, unless anyone feels otherwise. I trust everyone is OK with that, Xyl 54 (talk) 20:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
If you are so inclined, why not just create the new article on the USS Asp, copying in the material from Viper/Mohawk. There is no harm in having the info in two places. Viper/Mohawk participated in the capture of Asp and her service should be in the article about her, as well as in the article about Asp. Acad Ronin (talk) 23:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg)
