Talk:U.S. Route 223

Some print sources for the history

• Grigsby, John N. (February 20, 1957). "US 23 Work To Start in Michigan This Year". Toledo Blade. p. 1. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• "Michigan Asks To Reroute US 223". Toledo Blade. September 9, 1965. p. 29. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• "Route-Shift Plan Gains at Hearing". Toledo Blade. November 22, 1985. p. 16. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• Harvey, Hank (January 29, 1990). "Planning Gourp Seeks Upgrading of US 223". Toledo Blade. p. 13. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• Erb, Robin (September 27, 1994). "Michigan Seeks To Change Lanes on I-73, Move It West of Toledo". Toledo Blade. p. 11. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• "Michigan HIghway Plan Focuses on Repair Work: Engler Pledges Gradual Shift to New Construction". Toledo Blade. January 26, 2000. p. 9. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
• "Michigan Settles on on 3 Options for I-73: State Still May Decide not to Build Highway". Toledo Blade. December 14, 2000. p. B2. Retrieved December 19, 2010.

Just some I found in the Google News Archives. Imzadi 1979 → 08:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Business tab

Is there anyway to make the "Business" sign "attach" better to the "223" sign? Example:
Bus. US 223 (Maumee St.) If you can do it, thank you! Threeowls (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Just for reference,

US 223 Bus. (Maumee St.) This markup only works with certain states. Cards84664 (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@Threeowls: no. The {{jct}} template displays the banner plate(s), inserts a line break and then runs the markers and the rest of the text after it. Unless we come up with another way to display it, there's always the possibility that they'll end up detached. Since {{jct}} should only be used at the start of a new line, this is rarely an issue. Imzadi 1979 → 01:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, per MOS:ICON, we should never be displaying marker graphics in running text anyway, confining them to just the junction list in an infobox or the destinations column of a junction list. Imzadi 1979 → 01:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Imzadi, for responding so promptly! I looked around, and Business route 6 does the same thing. I'll quit worrying about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Threeowls (talk • contribs) 01:47, 5 April 2016‎ (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on U.S. Route 223. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820003118/http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MDOT_NHS_Statewide_150626_7.pdf to http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MDOT_NHS_Statewide_150626_7.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.i73.com/pdf/South%20takes%20the%20lead%20I-73%2008.24.07.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lenconnect.com/news/x121480165/Group-seeks-to-revive-I-73-interest-in-Michigan
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2012/04/17/Forum-planned-on-U-S-23-work-in-Monroe-Co.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513111800/http://www.us-highways.com/us1830.htm to http://www.us-highways.com/us1830.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)