Talk:U&Yesterday
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Are all programmes from the BBC?
editDoes anyone know if all programmes on this channel are BBC programmes? If not, who are the other suppliers of programmes?131.111.161.131 (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Why if Channel Yesterday on freeview is owned or party owned by BBC why are they allowed to show adverts when they recieve Licence Money.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.23.199 (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Answer to above question: because it is owned by BBC Worldwide, the commercial division of the BBC which has no access to any License Fee funds, but uses the profits it generates to subsidise the license fee for the main BBC public services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.37.190.89 (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Most of them are BBC TV Programs, but there are some ITV Programs (Sharpe, and I believe some of the Catherine Cookson dramas (although I couldn't tell you myself since I can't stand Catherine Cookson)) but there appear to be some independant films shown (Mostly Nugus/Martin that might have been shown on one of the other History Channels) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.181.208 (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sdfgh.gif
editImage:Sdfgh.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Reduction in Freeview hours?
editAccording to Digital Spy, the launch of Dave on 15 October 2007 will see UKTV history broadcast only between 7am and 6pm on Freeview (though it will be 7am-1am on Sky and Virgin). Apart from my personal prejudice (it's a very bad change: we have far more than enough lifestyle channels on Freeview already, but only one history channel) there may be enough of an actual news point there to put in the article somewhere. Loganberry (Talk) 13:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Capitalisation?
editI've noticed that on Sky the name is listed as YeSTERDAY, all uppercase with only the 'e' remaining lowercase. Is this an official change, or just a quirk of the listings? NikNaks93 (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Same on Virgin Media's EPG so probably that's how they want it to be written. 213.152.233.36 (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's just a quirk of the listings, the website lists on 'Yesterday'. If the name did become official, then per WP:MOSTM the article would remain 'Yesterday'. -- [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 14:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Redundancy
edit"either for purposes of timing, or, in the case of programmes previously shown on commercial terrestrial channels, to accommodate the current three commercial breaks within each hour long programme."
- In other words, either for timing or for timing. Lee M (talk) 02:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)