cookies?

edit

maybe we should go into why their product shows up under spybot as malware? Killemall22 (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. It shows up in various security software, but as "tracking cookie which may invade your privacy", not as malware per se. K7L (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.tradedoubler.com/
    Triggered by \btradedoubler\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This blacklisting somehow lead to the value of the article in Italian to have been folded into this article. It seems that either both or any variants of the entity's internet presence should be blacklisted, provided that there is a reasonable explanation, or neither. I tried to correct it, solely for the sake of completeness, but as I explained, it would not work. --lmaxmai (talk) 07:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply