Talk:Timeline of quantum mechanics

Timeline discussion

See the Timeline section at Talk:History of quantum mechanics for a discussion of this timeline's contents. There are still entries in this timeline that have questionable relevance to the history of quantum mechanics. — Myasuda (talk) 14:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Questionable still sounds like a reason for inclusion. But why are there two lists? I don't see why "founding experiments" should be separate. --Michael C. Price ^talk 23:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by "founding experiments". RockMagnetist (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, you mean History of quantum mechanics#Founding experiments. No, it probably should not be separate, but for now it might be useful because it is much shorter. At least now there aren't two lists in the same article! RockMagnetist (talk) 17:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

OR

Some of this timeline has the look of original research, with almost all of the references being primary (carried to an absurd extreme in the entry for Edward Raymond Andrew). It needs references from secondary sources. RockMagnetist (talk) 09:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations

See User:Guy vandegrift/Timeline of quantum mechanics (abridged). An abridged version this article has been accepted in Wikiversity:First Journal of Science. Ordinarily a submission precedes acceptance, but the copyright license allows me to accept without submission. Instead of wasting my time trying to publicize this journal, I consider all 5 million articles in Wikipedia as having already been submitted. Congratulations editors, you were one in about a million, chosen as one of three articles for the "zeroth" (mockup) edition of this brand new journal. Please contact me if you are interested in submitting another article, perhaps with your name in the byline as the editor of an abridged version of another WP article.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)