The contents of the Daniel P. Dukes page were merged into Tilikum (orca) on 5 July 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
A news item involving Tilikum (orca) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 January 2017.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
With all due respect, this wiki page is about a 2 year who was kidnapped and grew up bullied and exploited. The biographies of the humans he killed as a result of human mistreatment do not belong here. The humans should have pages of their own. 173.22.250.243 (talk) 01:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
They do have pages of their own, follow the subtopic links. WADR, as humans we are bound to be curious about the human angle, but I think the subsections re. the 3 deaths could easily be cut down to a minimum because they are covered in detail in the subtopics. Rodney Baggins (talk) 15:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Tilikum's offspring field in infobox needs sourcing or removing. Without verification, we cannot know the true status of any offspring (i.e. number that are still alive or not) and I suggest we remove this detail from the infobox, as it will inevitably become outdated and incorrect. Rodney Baggins (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under Life>Third Death change "he reportedly scalped her, then bit off her arm and swallowed it" to "he reportedly scalped her and bit off her arm."
The statement that Dawn Brancheau's arm was swallowed is incorrect. Per the OCSO report, Brancheau's arm was retrieved from Tilikum's mouth immediately after the body was recovered.[1] Both arms were present at the autopsy, with one being described as "completely avulsed" meaning detached via tearing.[2]Mattwood440 (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Reviewing your sources which both are from law enforcement, there are no indications of Brancheau's arm being dislocated nor swallowed. However The Daily Telegraph and Latin Times which were used to source "swallowed it" mentioned it. While I would like to BOLD forward and fulfil this request by removing the supposing factual errors since the sources from law enforcement doesn't exactly stated that, however maybe I'm missing something here hence would like another editor to take a look at it. —Paper9oll(🔔 • 📝)13:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I would not trust the Telegraph source for the information on this. From their story it's not clear where they obtained the information from, perhaps from the documentary filmmaker who was being interviewed. One detail which shows the paucity of information in their reporting, is that they make two different descriptions of how the trainer died. At the beginning of the Telegraph article they describe her death like this: A huge male orca, Tilikum, had leapt out of the water as Brancheau had been talking about the creature to a group of visitors, grabbed her with its jaws and dragged her under the water, where she drowned. Then, later on in the same Telegraph article, they list a timeline where they describe the trainer's death like this: Veteran trainer Dawn Brancheau, 40, is lying face-to-face on a shallow platform with Tilikum as part of a post-show routine, when the orca grabs her and drags her into the pool. So which one was it, was she laying on the platform as part of the routine and the orca grabbed her, or was she talking to the audience and the orca "leaped out and grabbed her"? Granted she could have been talking to the audience while laying face-to-face on the platform, but would the orca have had to "leap" to grab her if it was already face-to-face with her? Also, how does one determine if an orca has swallowed anything.... do they give it an x-ray, or do they check its excrement? It's small details like this which make one doubt the source's reporting in this case, and ask "how do they know what they know". I would agree with what the requesting editor is asking for, and that we give the information from the primary source, which is the medical record, saying the arm was not swallowed because at least their claims are backed by the physical evidence detailed in that report. The Telegraph has no such report to go on. Regards, Spintendo11:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Done Claim omitted. Regards, Spintendo 02:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)