This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The picture of Rees walking shows two men, a tall officer facing the camera and a small officer with a neckscarf turning away from it. On first viewing, the reader's attention is drawn to the taller man, but General Slim's Defeat into Victory states that Rees was remarkably small, and both the Lewin biography of Slim and the DNB refer to Rees' red scarf being famous. Moreover, he does not have a moustache in the DNB photograph, as the tall man does. Contrary to first impressions, he must therefore be the man on the left, and I have noted this in the article.
I am not sure who the officer on the right is. His cap badge appears to be that of a field marshal. That is very small pool, and the FMs likely to be in Burma in March 1945 are Wavell (then Viceroy of India), Brooke (based in London as Chief of the Imperial General Staff) or Auchinleck (Commander-in-Chief, India). The figure in the photo most closely resembles Brooke, but his published diary should be checked to see whether he was in south Asia at that point - I've read the diary and I don't recall such a visit. Matt's talk04:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
A correction has been made to the picture caption in the article; neither the 19th Indian Division, nor any other in the Indian Army, had "divisional colours". I agree that the badge was a yellow design on a red background, but Masters' autobiography makes it clear that Rees' red scarf was a matter of personal, morale-raising flamboyance. (Masters sarcastically suggested that Rees paint his jeep red too. Rees thought it an excellent idea, which he dropped only when Masters pointed out that the fire it would draw would cause unnecessary casualties to the escort and signal sections which had to follow the general everywhere.) HLGallon (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply