Talk:Thomas Davidson (philosopher)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 65.102.185.17 in topic Recent revert conflict

Recent revert conflict

edit

I have objections with this edit for the following reasons. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  1. I'm not convinced the Giant Chipmunk (Tamias minor) is legitimate. Anyone have a reference? --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. Image:Chipmunk 222.jpg - Species is not identified. Are we looking to encourage hand feeding of wild animals? The animal is not particularly visible. There are better images at commons than this. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  3. Image:Chipmunk 210.jpg - Species is not identified. If any should stay, it should be this one. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
  4. Image:Chipmunk 254.jpg - Species is not identified. Poor quality image. This adds nothing to the article. --Aranae 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I note that the edit has been restored. Would you please explain why this information should be included? --Aranae 03:11


I love my Chipmunk,"Spootie" as my pet but she can be a pest —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.185.17 (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply