This article is within the scope of WikiProject Concerts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of concerts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConcertsWikipedia:WikiProject ConcertsTemplate:WikiProject Concertsconcert
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
As there is clearly an edit war in progress, I have protected this page. That does not endorse the current version of the page. I request that involved editors discuss the image below, and try to reach a consensus regarding the image. Edit warring is not a suitable way to debate content issues- instead, they should be discussed on the article talk page. The protection will end in three days, or sooner if an agreement is reached. J Milburn (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, I think that my image is better. The other user arguments are that my image is too dark - that can be solved - and that it's....old, and it's time for changing. I don't think this is how things work here. If an non-free image is already used only a free image could replace it, and not just because some other user likes his picture better. The picture used before was at Commons but it was deleted. His argument as "chaning is good" is not valid. Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
You were critizing me for wanting to use MY picture, when you want to do the exact same thing. Anyways I think my image has better quality and more descriptive of stuff such as the wardrobe and so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi (talk • contribs) 21:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually this time I have to agree with ElPilotiDi. However, his image nees to have a proper rationale and a strong use as to why a non-free image of a living person is being used in the article. --Legolas(talk2me)03:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
.png){kind=small}
