This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Vichy Syndrome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Rather than have this article be entitled, "Vichy syndrome", which is a term from the book, it ought to be about the book, so it should be named, "The Vichy syndrome", and styled in italics. With that title, the content of Résistancialisme and Vichy syndrome, as two coinages by Rousso from the same book, could be merged into an article about the book. Mathglot (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Given the significant expansion recently, the lead should probably be rewritten (again) to take into account the new body material. And there is still missing material in the body, notably the revisions of the 1987 book, including the one co-authored with Eric Conana. Mathglot (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
