Talk:The Sand Reckoner

Comments

In Names of large numbers it is said that a myriad is $10^{8}$ however in this article it is said a myriad is 10,000. Which is correct? Answer: The Names of large numbers page actually says that a myriad myriads is $10^{8}$, consistent with the statement here that a myriad is $10^{4}$ (i.e. 10000). Niels Ø 00:41, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

I missed that, thanks.

Accuracy?

The resulting estimate is that the radius of the universe is about one light year which is consistent with current estimates for the radius of the solar system. Archimedes' final estimate gives an upper bound of 10⁶⁴ for the number of grains of sand in a filled universe.

It would be interesting to have an estimate of the actual number of grains that would fit in a one-light-year universe. — Johan the Ghost _seance 04:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Universe size?

I've not seen the estimate of 10^14 stadia for the diameter of Archimede's universe reinforced elsewhere: a more common number thrown about seems to be 10^9 stadia, which doesn't even encompass the majority of our solar system.

Haven't changed anything -- I'm not sure if my references are worth citing -- but I'm bringing attention to the discrepancy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.2.161.80 (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

As Archimedes explains in The Sand Reckoner, he uses the term universe (Greek: κόσμος) to denote a sphere whose radius is equal to the distance of the Earth from the Sun. He estimates the diameter of this sphere to be no more than 10¹⁰ stadia. In the heliocentric model he is using, however, the fixed stars are much further away from the Sun than the Earth is, so this sphere does not encompass everything observable. The much larger sphere of the fixed stars, which is estimated to have diameter no more than 10¹⁴ stadia, is the only sphere which can encompass everything observable, so it is the sphere which fits the modern usage of the word universe. Spacepotato 19:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Boice Numero-Linguistic Model of Number Naming

Could someone add a reference to an explanation of this system? The only page that turned up with this phrase when I Googled it was this one. It sounds interesting, but right now the notation is totally unclear. 68.170.182.217 (talk) 09:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

@ 179.190.227.20 (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Correct result would be useful

And just how many grains of sand are there in the universe? Surely in the last 2000 years somebody else must have estimated this. It would be good to see how far out he was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.209.111.210 (talk) 17:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Archimedes discussed how many grains of sand it would take to fill the universe... AnonMoos (talk) 07:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sand Reckoner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040808005307/http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/hmendel/Ancient%20Mathematics/Archimedes/SandReckoner/SandReckoner.html to http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/hmendel/Ancient%20Mathematics/Archimedes/SandReckoner/SandReckoner.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)