Talk:The Phantom

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jock123 in topic “Pupils”?

The kids

edit

The addition "and after their birth there were several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys." keeps getting removed by anonymous users. What's the deal here? // Liftarn 10:48, 21 July 2005‎

I'm the "anonymous user" (only anonymous because I haven't bothered to register yet). It has been common for people who disapproved of the Phantom's marriage and raising a family to claim that "the Phantom is all about diapers and babies now" in a derogatory way. But the fact is that it is an opinion that is very loosely based on fact. To claim that there are "several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys." is simply incorrect. There are some stories where the Phantom's family life is mentioned but rarely, if ever, the basis of an entire episode. //AE (soon-to-be-member?)

No, not an entre episode, but there were several episodes where the kids played a part, for instance in one episode The Phantom went back to look for a lost toy and saw some bad guys doing something. In another episode his position was revealed because one of the kids started to cry. So it's correct to say that there were "several episodes of The Phantom changing diapers and looking for lost toys", but the episodes weren't entierly about that. // Liftarn 01:48, 25 July 2005

I would agree that on several occasions the Phantom's family life was featured in the strip after the birth of the twins, but not that there were several "episodes of the Phantom changing diapers" (I can think of only one, and that was in a dream sequence) and "looking for lost toys" (you give one example, and that is the only one I can remember too). If you added something about his family life/raising the twins (and not highlighting diapers and toys) aswell as find some other word than "episode" (which can easily be interpreted as the whole episode) it would be more correct. //AE

Guran

edit

I edited a section claiming Mandrake the Magician was the Phantom's best man at his wedding, which is misinformation. I wrote a new article about Guran, and also about the Skull Cave. Would anybody help out with pictures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.131.224 (talk) 04:08, 1 August 2006‎

Australian Woman's mirror

edit

I removed the picture from the woman magazine to the Lee Falk page. The Phantom page is getting a bit crowded with all these pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.131.224 (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2006‎

Diana Palmer and Guran

edit

I have written articles about both Diana Palmer and Guran now. It would be appreciated if anybody could help out with a picture or two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.131.224 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2006‎

Toys

edit

Someone just added a new section to the article, called "Toys". I don't think it belongs here; but it could do if it was more expansive and looked less like a commercial for Shocker Toys' Phantom action figure. Comments? KIT WALKER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.131.224 (talk) 06:24, 4 November 2006‎

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on The Phantom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

“Pupils”?

edit

The article refers more than once to the character’s eyes being drawn without pupils when masked; while this may be technically so, they are also drawn without irises too (indeed, this is more obvious than the lack of a pupil, as unmasked cartoon characters often appear only to have a large iris (drawn as an otherwise featureless black dot), with or without the white sclera); they are effectively blank eyeballs, not simply pupil-less. Jock123 (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply