Talk:The Motto (Tiësto and Ava Max song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will go for this just after your previous effort passed! --K. Peake 09:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• "while produced by Tiësto and" → "while produced by the DJ and" to avoid overusage of his name
• "as well as the vocal delivery of the singer." → "and the vocal delivery of Max."
• "and reached the top five on rankings" either mention the number of countries it reached the top five or top 10 in, then add ones these included
• For both gold and platinum certifications, add the number of countries each were in and list a few examples
• "and the UK" → "and the United Kingdom"
• "and the US." → "and the United States."
• "for "The Motto" premiered" → "for the song premiered"

Background and composition

• "Few days prior to" → "A few days prior to"
• "depth to ['the song']," while" → "depth to ['the song']", while"
• ""The Motto" is a" → "Musically, "The Motto" is a"
• Why is [7] at the end of the above sentence when it offers no mention of eurodance?

Critical reception

• "widely received critical acclaim" → "was met with widespread critical acclaim"
• BroadwayWorld should not be italicised
• "and the party begins again."" → "and the party begins again!"" per the source
• "signature dance soundscape."" → "signature dance soundscape"." per MOS:QUOTE; fix the repeated occurrences of these issues throughout
• Dancing Astronaut should not be italicised

Commercial performance

• "as Tiësto's sixth and" → "standing as Tiësto's sixth and"
• Mention the Dance/Mix Show Airplay chart since you have written that in the lead
• "more than 1,000,000 copies" → "more than 1,000,000 equivalent copies" because that is what the certification actually is
• "the song reached number 6" → "the song reached number 6 on"
• Remove pipe on Canada Hot AC, as that is the same sub-section the previous term leads to
• "from Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)" → "from the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)"
• "and number 6 in on" → "and number 6 on" also, I would recommend moving the United Kingdom to being after its singles chart so the sentence doesn't imply Ireland is part of the country
• "from British Phonographic Industry (BPI)" → "from the British Phonographic Industry (BPI)"
• Wouldn't it be better to use the plural for the certifications?

Music video

• Img looks good!
• "leaving out a hotel party" are you sure this is correct grammatically?
• "and causing all the guests to" → "and this causes all the guests to"
• "as a nod to the" → "a reference to the"

Track listing

• Good

Credits and personnel

• Good

Charts

Weekly charts

• Why is Czech Republic radio chart included too when the single one is there?

• All Czech charts are included in almost every music article, as well as the Hungarian ones. Iaof2017 (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Monthly charts

• Good

Year-end charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Release history

• Format → Format(s)
• Label → Label(s)

See also

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks pretty decent at 37.9%!
• Wikilink Spotify on ref 2
• Add url-access limited to ref 3
• Wikilink Apple Music on the first citation of ref 4
• Should We Rave You be cited as publisher instead on refs 6, 12 and 82 since it is not italicised in prose?
• Cite BroadwayWorld as publisher instead on ref 11
• Cite Dancing Astronaut as publisher instead on ref 14
• Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 17
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 19
• Billboard l → Billboard on ref 23
• Wikilink Monitor Latino on ref 47 instead of ref 53
• Wikilink Tophit on ref 50 instead of ref 54
• Pipe PROPHON to International Federation of the Phonographic Industry on ref 84
• Pipe HRT to Croatian Radiotelevision on ref 85

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this took as long as I thought! --K. Peake 12:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

• Hi again @Kyle Peake:, I have everything addressed and thank you for the review and your continous work throughout Wikipedia. Iaof2017 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, good job and you have implemented everything! --K. Peake 10:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)