Talk:The Boat Race 2005

Latest comment: 10 years ago by SchroCat in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 2005/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SchroCat (talk · contribs) 14:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Overall Again, nicely put together, and close to GA as it stands. I've made a couple of very small tweaks: nothing too much.

Lead

Crews

  • "Oxford coach Dan Topolski rated both crews as "good enough to make an Olympic final".": this looks like it's a direct quote from Topolski, but the source doesn't seem to suggest it is.

Race description

  • No dab or dead links, refs are solid.

Again, minor pickings from me, and no deal-breakers again, just a little tweak here and there. - SchroCat (talk) 19:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@SchroCat: Thanks again, you're a gent. Have responded and updated accordingly, hopefully by the time you're back I'll have made the lead a bit fatter. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Excellent: all good and happy to pass here.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  Y
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  Y
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  Y
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  Y
    C. No original research:  Y
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  Y
    B. Focused:  Y
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  Y
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  Y
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Y
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  Y
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: All good: I am happy to  PassSchroCat (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply