Talk:The Beautiful People (song)
The Beautiful People (song) was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA passed
edit- 1. Well written? Pass
- 2. Factually accurate? Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage? Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view? Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images? Pass
Additional comment : Make sure that the inline citations come after the punctuation.
I am impressed by the prose of the section describing the song which is quite innovative in such articles and quite riveting at its attempt to bring such information to the reader. Lincher 20:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's great news, and while I'm quite proud of the article as it is, it's still a work in progress. I'm really hoping to (rather sooner than later) get it up to WP:FA quality; any feedback from anyone who may have reviewed it during the WP:GA process would be appreciated. --keepsleeping slack off! 21:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- The following is what one editor's assessment of the article is (which'll aid people in this article gaining FA status;
The Beautiful People is a nice article. I'd stub out or remove as many of the redlinks as possible; try to find more reviews (only 2?!); get a source for the discography info. Also there's info which is in the lead but not in the body. --kingboyk 11:45, 17 October 2006
- I feel addressing these concerns would vastly improve its chances of FA. Also, the charting information (gaining number 26) should be covered under "Critical response" as well as in the lead. LuciferMorgan 17:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Well i'm not necessarily a fan of Manson much anymore, but have stumbled upon this page, and must say this is the way a page should look like. good job with this page.
Backwards
edit- Ok backwards it is is very Demonic cause i will say "The Evil Satan" that is very evil i am a Christian so many will find this song very bad Except Goth's. Demon Hunter Rules {{SUBST:Kate Beckinsale is hot}} 21:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
What??TheEmpiricalGuy (talk) 09:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, when it is played backwards it says "Im evil believe it", you can try it yourself Hellspriest (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Apathy Song
editso i dont know shit about editing wikipedia but i feel like the Apathy song of the same name should be mentioned as a song that samples this one.
Christina Aguilera Samples
editChristina Aguilera is releasing a song of the same name which also samples 'The Beautiful People'
http://toyaz-world.net/2010/11/christina-aguilera-the-beautiful-people-new-song/
Article delisted from GA category
editThis article has just has its GA status reassessed as part of the WP:SWEEPS; the article was found to have substantial problems, especially in the matter of referencing and Lead layout. Given the substantial nature of these deficiencies, the article has been failed immediately as it is felt that the necessary improvements required to meet the GA criteria will not be made within a 7-day grace period. However, as there has been some (minor) activity on this article recently, and because it is listed under 3 WikiProjects, if the issues outlined in the reassessment are addressed and resolved within 7 days, I will undertake an immediate GA review to re-list the article. The reassessment review can be found here. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries regarding this matter. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 22:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011
editSince Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
Sources
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Beautiful People (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061213051514/http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:132259
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Beautiful People (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313170007/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=37436 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=37436
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313170007/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=37436 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=37436
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223051601/http://www.resnet.trinity.edu:80/ddamon/hierophant/lexicon/acs-2.htm to http://www.resnet.trinity.edu/ddamon/hierophant/lexicon/acs-2.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616145338/http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)