Talk:Tennena Cone

This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria.
Please feel free to leave comments.
After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes.

Tennena Cone has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 27, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes: Canada Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 days ago13 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tennena Cone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 16:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 15:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this review. Please note that I may bring up subjects that are not specifically GA criteria. I will identify these explicitly when mentioning them, and they will not affect a pass or fail decision. These are intended to help you further refine the article, perhaps with the goal of taking it to FAC. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Image review

File:Tennena Cone.jpg - License checks out
File:Mt. Edziza - 4037245997.jpg - License checks out
File:Mt. Edziza - 4037996194.jpg - License checks out
For the alt text and captions, mind that items that are not full sentences should not have periods (i.e., A black cone-shaped mountain rising over glacial ice and three climbers in the foreground)
Done. Volcanoguy 15:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose

The cone is almost completely surrounded by glacial ice of Mount Edziza's ice cap - "the glacial ice", maybe?
alkali basalt pillow lavas, tuff breccias and lapilli - This goes against WP:SEAOFBLUE
WP:SEAOFBLUE claims when possible, do not place links next to each other, to avoid appearing like a single link; it's not always possible to avoid two links placed next to each other. Volcanoguy 16:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
The name of the volcanic cone was adopted 2 January 1980 on the National Topographic System map 104G/10 - "Adopted on", maybe?
I'm not sure, the source claims "Adopted 2 January 1980 on 194G, as submitted by Geological Survey of Canada." Volcanoguy 15:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cassiar Land District of northwestern British Columbia, Canada, - "the Cassiar Land District of northwestern British Columbia, Canada," perhaps (applies to both)
I don't think so. Volcanoguy 16:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Its northern, eastern and southern flanks are mantled by the roughly 70-square-kilometre (27-square-mile) Mount Edziza ice cap and rises about 150 metres (490 feet) - Your subject was "flanks", so "rise" would be the correct verb.
Done. Volcanoguy 15:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
bedded tuff breccia - Sea of blue again
See above. Volcanoguy 16:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Pleistocene tristanite, trachyte - More sea of blue
See above. Volcanoguy 16:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source review

2a - Supported
2d - Supported
2h - Supported
26 - Supported
51 - Supported
Earwig shows no issues.

Conclusion

Overall, article is in excellent shape. Just a few nipicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Alright, that's all of my questions addressed. Happy to say that this meets the GA criteria. Congratulations. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic