I re-wrote this article to try and meet your criteria.
I don't feel there is any advertising, it is all historical fact, intended to give information about the company that will delineate it from two other companies with the same name.
There are links all over the web to this company's website, from non-affiliated parties. This should allow it to meet the criteria, if I read the rules correctly.
- Better. I'm not sure - we'll wait and see what the admin who looks at this does. Blood red sandman 19:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I am concerned that this article is just an advertisement. All of the references are either corporate web sites, catalogs, or a how to guide that mentions a purchase from the company. There are no references from either trade press, general press, or any other article that talks about the company except as a mention in passing. Is a single award from a supplier enough to be notable?. A search of Google showed a lot of companies with a very similar name, but hardly any links about this company. And a search of new.google showed zero hits. But if this article could be improved with less advertising and a better claim of notability, maybe it should survive. So I will wait a few days before I tag it as an non-notable advertisement. WVhybrid 04:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
