Talk:TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All-Time

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Woodensuperman in topic Complete list

Page deletion history as "TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All Time"

edit
  • 06:11, 18 August 2011 Zscout370 (talk | contribs) deleted page TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All Time (Expired PROD, concern was: copyvio list)
  • 05:36, 5 September 2010 Jclemens (talk | contribs) deleted page TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All Time (Expired PROD, concern was: This is a list based solely on an article by TV Guide, which is not even cited on the page.)--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrong episode of 24

edit

Hi, I think the wrong episode of 24 is listed. The archived guide has "11:00 p.m. – 12:00 a.m." but the article has "12:00 a.m. – 1:00 a.m.". It used to have the former but was edited in 2015. If no one opposes I'll change it in a few days. Newyorkadam (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)NewyorkadamReply

Complete list

edit

@Woodensuperman I'm not sure saying that having a list of 100 episodes in an article about those same 100 episodes is WP:INDISCRIMINATE or WP:LISTCRUFT. This isn't a general article about TV Guide or a general article about top x lists. If you think the list is not notable (and it might be), then nominiate the article. But if the subject itself is notable, then having the list is completely part of the article. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's absolutely WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Republishing lists that have appeared in a magazines is not encyclopedic. While the lists themselves may be notable, reproducing them in their entirety here is textbook WP:LISTCRUFT. --woodensuperman 12:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Even The Sight and Sound Greatest Films of All Time 2022, probably the most prestigious magazine film list in the world, only lists the top 10 from each list. --woodensuperman 12:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, isn't there a WP:COPYVIO issue? --woodensuperman 12:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply