Talk:Swapnalokam

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2021. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability/Suggestion

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Hello@DreamRimmer@DareshMohan@Kailash29792, There is one independent reliable source currently on the page (review in Zamin Ryot.) which is not a passing mention. However, in general, two reviews at least are required to prove the page may be notable. But the film being a remake of a notable film and most informations, including its music being verifiable, could we agree to publish the page directly as a redirect to Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa#Telugu-language remake? the section has not been created yet, and there basic informations would be mentioned. That's the best option unless other reviews in Telugu or other languages are found, imv. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would say, 'Go for it.' 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Mushy Yank: Wouldn't that be a bit odd though? I would just expand the sentence in the lead to say starring Jagapathi Babu and Raasi. DareshMohan (talk) 22:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not sure I understand@DareshMohan. What are you afraid would be odd? the redirect? I don't think so, no. It would make sense, in my opinion. Maybe not merging all the page content but the main facts. The book reference in the article mentions the film as a remake. As for expanding the intro, I don't know if that is enough to show the film is notable (I mean: I am sure it is not, to be honest). Also, I am confused: the actors you mention are already mentioned in the intro. Did you mean something else? In the new section of the target article? Yes, sure if that is what you mean. Anyway, not much I can do. If you or other users wish to expand and source the page, it's your call, but I would advise to add at least another review or another book reference before either submitting or publishing it. As it seems hard to find those sources for the moment, the redirect seemed like a good option to me. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Mushy Yank: First and foremost, I would like to thank you for your involvement in this draft (there seems to be a lack of editors for older films in general especially Telugu-language films). Ok, no problem. Go ahead and do it per WP:Bold. I know that Wikipedia policy is one longer page vs a stub page. As per the intro, I was talking about the Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa page, it currently says that "The film was remade in Telugu as Swapnalokam (1999)". DareshMohan (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Done-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic