![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Premium train page were merged into Suvidha Express on 2017-08-08. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with Premium train
editOne subject, two articles. Clear duplicity. Also Premium Express was created after the creation of Premium train, possibly without checking/ignoring the availability of similar article on main space. Visit WP:CREATE. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 14:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Shivamsetu and Superfast1111 - Feedback required on the above issue, since you were creators of the respective articles. Thank you very much!. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 14:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
My views
editIt would appear that i am in error but the other article has been incorrectly labeled as Premium train which is probably why i missed it. Premium Express is the correct term on the lines of Rajdhani Express, Shatabdi Express etc. Suggest the description & image from my article be used along the references from the other article. Superfast1111 (talk) 05:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nope, the title Premium trains is correct as per source and so as should be for Rajdhani, Shatabdi and other series too. "Express" is a term used to denote a single service/train, whereas "trains" is a sort of collective form for a group of train. IMO, they should have been too titled as Rajdhani trains, Janshatabdi trains, etc. But whereas no difference of opinion with "Express" as suffix for a train service between two places. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 15:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps, but now that we have classified Rajdhani Express, Shatabdi Express, Jan Shatabdi Express, Garib Rath Express & ofcourse Duronto Express, therefore i still feel that Premium Express is the appropriate title since they are a new category of trains. So i have to disagree with you. But anyway lets wait it out & see what some other editors say about it. Superfast1111 (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Superfast1111 & βα£α : In my opinion, both articles should be merged into one. Either one is fine. But Premium train looks more appropriate as it has been used in all the news and other communicating medias. Logical1004 (talk) 10:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Everyone I've noticed that on two pages Premium train & Premium Express article was compared by me I've got that Premium Express was in listed mode and Premium train was in encyclopedic mode and have many references also there so the contents of that article was merged into Premium Express, Thanks Feroze Ahmad 2 (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Premium Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131125225205/http://www.indianrail.gov.in/ to http://www.indianrail.gov.in/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)