This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
her surname
edit@RJFF: pls see this link above [1], its spell 'na Ayudhya' all, thx. --แอนเดอร์สัน (talk) 10:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @แอนเดอร์สัน: This is a document from 1929, not related to the subject of the article at all. On the other hand, we have several notable sources (New York Times, The Telegraph, AP, International Business Times, New Mandala) directly mentioning Suthida and using the "Ayudhaya" spelling. You probably know as well as I do that there are no generally binding transcriptions of Thai names and sometimes members of the same family use variant spellings of the same name in Roman letters. Compare e.g. Chirayu Isarangkun Na Ayuthaya who uses yet another transcription. --RJFF (talk) 10:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
High military titles
editFemale full generals are a very rare species indeed, and in this case her career has been exceptionally fast. Has Suthida been an active, working senior officer taking real decisions and responsibilities, or are some of these titles more or less empty honorifics? 195.67.149.165 (talk) 08:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Children
editIs it correct that Suthida and the King have an 11 years old son? There are conflicting information. 84.169.199.131 (talk) 21:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Suthida and the King has a son Nui Tidjai, born in 2015 and the son is hidden in Switzerland. We suggest that Switzerland repatriate him.[1] 170.64.206.141 (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
A random meme
editWell, some news said that Mother's Day in Thailand is now Suthida's birthday instead of Sirikit's birthday. Suthida: yea boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Raisul-wiki (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Her Father's name
editWhat is her father's name?. Surname is Tidjai. --81.37.111.138 (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Her religion
editI do not think that Queen Suthida adheres to Mahayana Buddhism, more likely Theravada Buddhism. Even with Chinese folk religions, I think that is not quite accurate as well. I think Thai royalty are by default Theravada. Kbkfromthailand (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 12 May 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not Moved (non-admin closure) ExtorcDev (talk) 13:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Suthida → Queen Suthida – Several reasons. Before I explain the reasons I'd like to state that this might be a controversial move due to a series of Wikipedia guidelines so I'm choosing this avenue to encourage discussion and consensus. As for the reasons, the general rule for royal consorts is WP:CONSORTS but it treats Thailand as a special case and points to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Thailand-related articles, specifically the section for names. It discourages the use of Thailand and princely titles but neither is being proposed here. The CONSORTS policy generally encourages the use of queen + name, and this is what I'm proposing here but in keeping in line with the manual of style for Thai names. That manual does not discourage the use of queen explicitly like it does with princely titles but it explicitly takes note of substantive titles. Now, it's a bit tricky if her title can be considered substantive due to Wikipedia's definition of substantive titles but Suthida's own Wikipedia page has two sources stating that the title queen was granted to her by the king, so it could be treated as a substantive title and one that is not discouraged by the Wikipedia manual of style for Thai names. Lastly, a cursory examination of recent news articles shows people using Queen Suthida, they don't drop the queen title like Wikipedia does so using it here would be just as sensible. Killuminator (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Primarily based on WP:TITLECON. You only need to look at the articles on the previous Thai/Siamese queens, none of which start with the prefix "Queen": Sirikit (who's still alive), Rambai Barni, Saovabha Phongsri, Savang Vadhana, Sukhumala Marasri, Debsirindra, Sri Suriyendra, and Amarindra. The use of the prefix "Queen" before a consort's name is not something that the community unanimously agrees on (see this discussion) and we do have articles on living consorts where the prefix is not used (ex. Jetsun Pema, 'Masenate Mohato Seeiso, Tunku Azizah Aminah Maimunah Iskandariah, and Nanasipauʻu Tukuʻaho). That is because Asian and African queens have unique names that do not warrant a prefix for the purpose of disambiguation. That is not the case for Queen Letizia of Spain; her article cannot be titled "Letizia" considering the fact that we have dozens of articles on women with that exact first name. With Suthida we have no such problem. Keivan.fTalk 18:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Keivan.f. There is no need to force the word 'queen' into a title where it isn't needed. Srnec (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Keivan.f. I wouldn't be opposed to "Queen Suthida of Thailand" and "Queen Sirikit of Thailand" (among other living consorts inconsistent with CONSORTS) and moving deceased consorts to their maiden names (also in line with CONSORTS). estar8806 (talk) ★ 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)