Talk:Sulphide Creek Falls

Untitled

I drastically rewrote this page because much of the data presented was either based on conjecture and supposition, or was largely irrelevant and inaccurate. I removed the former "Characteristics" section because it described details of the waterfall that simply cannot be confirmed. As one of the very few people who has been to this location I can attest that nobody has surveyed the falls to the accuracy that was being portayed by the previous version of the article. I removed the "Formation" section because it was largely unrelated, inaccurate and irrelevant to the topic at hand and should be left to either the Mount Shuksan or North Cascades articles.Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 23:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

In the article on Sulphide Creek Falls at the Northwest Waterfalls page, it clearly states that the tallest drop is around 400 feet, so it wouldn't be unfair to keep that measurement as for example: "The tallest drop is more or less than 400 feet" (or something like that) instead of removing it outright.themaee 02:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Its reasonable to mention that as long as it is also mentioned that its a purely speculatory estimate (again, I know because I am the author and that figure was eyeballed from half a mile away). However I think that since not enough is known about the waterfall, leaving super detailed information like that out for the time being is not a bad thing.Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)